January 24, 2012

Trialing Solar Lights in Rwanda, Part 2

Filed under: Research, Trials — Tags: , — admin @ 5:08 PM

DSC05871

Part 1 of this blog post explained why we’re conducting a solar light trial in our Rwanda operation, and what we hope to find out from the trial. In short, we’re trying to determine the demand and financial impact of different solar lights, as well as whether offering solar lights fits our mission.

Though we’re still in the early stages of the trial, we have done some interviews with trial farmers to find out what they think of the lights thus far. In this blog post, we’ll share the stories of two farmers and their first experience with solar lighting.

Vincent

Vincent Yambabariye is a One Acre Fund farmer in Mukimba. He joined One Acre Fund in 2010, and he decided to buy the solar lamp because he’s been able to save money from his great harvests. He believes that the lamp will help him save money that he would normally spend on batteries for his radio and flashlight.

Normally, Vincent uses candles and kerosene lamps to light his house, but the “light was not sufficient,” he says. He spends over 50,000 Rwanda francs ($85 USD) per year on lighting.

“This is an important project for One Acre Fund to extend all over the country as a way of helping farmers,” Vincent says.

Thus far, he is very happy with his lamp. He says it can even be used in the rain, if you need to stay safe when you are walking at night. He also says the light lasts for a long time. “I am going to pass the night with the light that I have not had since I was born,” he says.

Marie Jeanne

Marie Jeanne with her newly received solar light.

Marie Jeanne with her newly received solar light.

Marie Jeanne Mukangamije joined One Acre Fund in 2011. She is “astonished at the opportunities” she has received, and now wishes she had joined when One Acre Fund first entered her village in 2010.

For her first season with One Acre Fund, Marie Jeanne planted maize. Because she expects a good harvest in February, she decided to buy the solar lamp to help her reduce her lighting expenses. Last year, she spent more than 60,000 Rwanda francs ($102 USD) lighting her home.

“Solar lights will help One Acre Fund enroll more clients,” she says.

She expects that the solar light will help her children study in the evenings and improve their grades at school. She herself is looking forward to listening to her radio, which has not been working because she has not had money to buy batteries for it.

Finally, she says that the solar light will help her most with her daily evening activities. “I have not had a safe supper because I always cook in darkness. Now, anytime I want, I can prepare food safely for my family.”

Vincent and Marie Jeanne believe that the solar lights will have a positive effect on their households. We look forward to sharing the impact results of our solar trial in Rwanda as it continues!

January 17, 2012

Trialing Solar Lights in Rwanda, Part 1

Filed under: Research, Trials — Tags: , — admin @ 4:58 PM

This One Acre Fund farmer, a participant in the trial, is picking up her solar lamp at the distribution in December.

A One Acre Fund farmer picks up her solar lamp at the distribution in December.

Almost 300 One Acre Fund farmers in Rwanda rang in 2012 with solar lamps lighting up their homes. They are all participants in our Rwanda operation’s first solar lights trial. This initiative follows in the footsteps of our Kenya program, where after a successful trial in 2010, we offered solar lights to all Kenya clients in 2011. Over 10,000 farmers bought the lights.

Though there are many similarities between our farmers in Kenya and Rwanda, we want to make sure that any new product we offer meets our internal standards for impact. We never make assumptions about impact—we always conduct trials.

Before starting our Rwanda trial on solar lights, we collected some data. Only 1 percent of rural Rwandans were connected to the electricity grid as of 2009. As a result, most of our clients are dependent on kerosene lamps, candles, flashlights, and burning wood for light. Our farmers’ need for household lighting is especially pronounced, due to the relatively early hour of sunset: Rwanda is close to the equator, which means it gets dark at roughly 6:30pm.

Based on this data, the potential impact of solar lights on our clients is high. The improved quality of light that is provided by solar lights can positively affect productivity; evening pursuits, from household chores to economic activities to schoolwork, are easier (or only possible!) when tasks are well illuminated. Solar lights also supply hours of power at a time, adding quantity to quality. As a result, they can potentially save households money through decreased expenditures on kerosene, candles, batteries and even cell phone charging. Finally, solar lights may provide health advantages, by limiting exposure to smoke generated by kerosene lamps.

Solar lights also have the potential to benefit One Acre Fund as an organization. Diversifying our product offerings allows us to move toward financial sustainability at a more rapid rate. In addition, the opportunity to purchase solar lights on credit may entice new farmers to join One Acre Fund—many rural Rwandans already view the lamps as desirable products, but are unable to access them due to geographic and financial barriers (barriers that One Acre Fund distribution would largely remove).

We designed our trial to achieve the following objectives:

  • Determine the demand for different types of solar lights
  • Determine the financial impact of each type of solar light (including money saved on energy expenditures, money earned from selling cell-phone charging, hours saved by charging cell phones at home, and extra hours of light per night).
  • Determine the non-financial impact of each type of solar light (primarily the change in the number of hours that students study at night)
  • Determine whether solar lights further One Acre Fund’s mission of making more farmers more prosperous

The trial is being implemented in three places in Karongi District, Rwanda, all off the grid. Each cell was given access to a different selection of solar lights manufactured by Tough Stuff and Greenlight Planet. The lights range in price from 15,000 Rwanda francs (about $25 USD) to 24,800 Rwanda francs (about $40 USD) and have a product life of 3-5 years. All One Acre Fund clients in the trial cells had the opportunity to take a loan for a solar light, with a loan term of 6-9 months. Roughly 35 percent of clients chose to adopt one of the solar lights. If the same percentage held true during a full-scale rollout, over 16,000 farmers would purchase lights.

We have also selected four locations to be controls for the trial. More than 200 farmers in the control cells, all without solar lights, are tracking their daily energy use, spending habits, household commodities (# of cell phones, flashlights, kerosene lamps, radios) and children’s study habits. We will compare this data with that of the trial farmers in order to isolate the impact of solar lights. The control areas were chosen to minimize the differences between the trial and control group participants and will therefore provide a strong baseline for our analysis.

This trial kicked off in the middle of December, so we are looking forward to finding out what the first round of data has to tell us. In the meantime, we’ve done some interviews with trial farmers to hear what they think of the lights so far. In Part 2 of this blog post, we’ll share the stories of two One Acre Fund farmers and their first experience with solar lighting.

January 9, 2012

Working with District Agricultural Officers in Kenya

Filed under: Policy — Tags: , — admin @ 4:55 PM

One Acre Fund recognizes the importance of fully engaging with Kenya’s Ministry of Agriculture at both national and local levels. Our services to farmers are firmly in keeping with the goals set out in the Kenyan government’s strategic plans for agriculture, and we are eager to complement the important extension work done by the Ministry of Agriculture, in order to continue improving the lives of Kenya’s smallholder farmers.

In recent months, we’ve increased our level of engagement with agriculture officers at the local level. We have good relations with DAOs across Western and Nyanza Provinces, but we feel that we could be doing more to keep them informed about our work. To start this process, in November, One Acre Fund brought two groups of district agriculture officers together in Kakamega and Bungoma to update them on our work and future expansion plans.

In Kakamega, One Acre Fund was pleased to meet with John Cheriuiyot (PDA Western) Rono Vitalis (DAO Kakamega North), Bertha Wachieye (DAO Kakamega South), Virginia Gitau (DAO Kakamega Central), Titus Omengo (DAO Kakamega East), James Shiundu (DAO Matete), Newton Odari (DAO Butere), and Luka Rotich (DAO Hamisi).

This meeting gave a useful insight into the experiences of local government officials working with One Acre Fund, and provided valuable guidance on how we can move forward and develop stronger working relationships in the field. In particular, we learned more about the regular stakeholder meetings held by the local government, and how One Acre Fund can participate in those meetings and share best practices on agriculture development.

Untitled

After the meeting, those present were able to move to One Acre Fund’s weekly staff meeting in Kakamega. More than fifty field staff from One Acre Fund’s Kakamega operations were introduced to their DAOs, and were given an interesting overview of the work the government is doing in Western Kenya.

In Bungoma, One Acre Fund had the privilege of meeting with Elizabeth Ogola (DAO Bungoma South), Alice Kafwa (DAO Bungoma East), Susan Nkesa (DAO Bungoma North), Stanley Kirui (DAO Bungoma Central), and Mary Wambui (DAO Kimilili).

This meeting gave One Acre Fund an opportunity to update DAOs on the current status of our field operations in Bungoma. We were particularly grateful for the DAOs’ honest feedback, sharing with us their experiences from the field. They had a lot of thoughtful questions about our operations, and requested more regular updates on our work. This feedback has guided our plans for engaging with local officials more comprehensively in 2012.

In 2012, One Acre Fund will bring on two local government officers to coordinate our engagement with local officers. These officers will serve as the first point of contact at One Acre Fund for local government officials. They will produce quarterly reports on our operations, and they will organize yearly field visits for district agriculture officers to see our operations firsthand. We are confident that these efforts will keep DAOs and other officials even more informed of our operations, and we hope it will produce a steady dialogue in the interests of smallholder farmers.

In the next two years, the Kenyan government will shift from a centralized structure to decentralized county governments. These county governments will be responsible for determining the agriculture development priorities in their counties with minimal input from the national government. We view this process as a great opportunity to make sure that smallholder farmers are supported by smart local policies. By building strong relationships now, we will have a great opportunity to help shape county agriculture policy in 2013.

One Acre Fund will work with more than 55,000 smallholder farmers in Kenya next year. As we continue to grow, we seek to increase the impact of our core field operations by sharing our lessons learned with Kenya’s agriculture policymakers. There are millions of smallholder farmers in Kenya that are not enrolled in One Acre Fund—engaging with the local government is the first step toward reaching them.

One Acre Fund staff with District Agricultural Officers in Kakamega, and officials from the Ministry of Agriculture.

One Acre Fund staff with District Agricultural Officers in Kakamega, and officials from the Ministry of Agriculture.

December 27, 2011

Our Rwanda Farmers Are Expecting Great Maize Harvests

Filed under: CoreProgram, FieldPhotos — Tags: — admin @ 12:15 AM

DSC04530

December 19, 2011

Fall 2011 Performance Report

Filed under: CoreProgram, Operations — Tags: , — admin @ 11:45 PM

CoveroptionEvery six months, One Acre Fund pulls together a performance report that provides our donors with an honest view of our progress. Our most recent report, for the six months ending October 2011, discusses the following accomplishments:

  • Grew program size from 54,000 farm families to 75,000 farm families, serving more than 300,000 children.
  • Had our tenth harvest, increasing take-home farm income by 100% per acre, with 98% of farmers repaying program fees.
  • Covered 77% of our field costs through farmer repayments, exceeding our 2011 goal of 75%.

This report briefly concludes with our vision for the future, which we are truly excited about. Our momentum continues to build at a terrific pace, and we are on track to create life change for 180,000 families in the next 24 months.

You can also check out our previous performance reports here.

December 8, 2011

Our Growing Monitoring and Evaluation Team in Rwanda, Part 2

Filed under: Metrics, Operations — Tags: , — admin @ 4:49 PM

At One Acre Fund, we focus on three main results metrics: scale, impact, and sustainability. In each country operation, we have a monitoring and evaluation department that is responsible for measuring impact. Part 1 of this blog post looked at how Rwanda’s M&E team has expanded enormously in the past year. This blog post will look at one specific survey that the M&E team is implementing to explore how the M&E department’s role extends beyond collecting data on One Acre Fund’s impact.

The Rwanda M&E team is increasingly running multi-purpose studies/surveys, such as this year’s planting survey, that provide data that is relevant for strategy, operations, and impact. Over a two-month period, we conducted the 30-question planting survey with about 20 percent of our total clients (more than 9,000 surveys total). To put this in perspective, just two years ago, 9,000 surveys would have been about 100 percent of our clients! Conducting such a large volume of surveys in a limited time period was a phenomenal accomplishment on the part of both the surveyors and the data entry team.

The questions in the survey aimed largely to measure:

1. Farmer compliance with our planting instructions, and understanding why discrepancies exist (are they rational, or do they stem from misunderstanding/miscommunication?)

2. Field officer (FO) performance. We developed a weighted score for each field officer, comprised of four variables (what % of an FO’s farmers received planting training, what % of clients received planting follow-up in the field, what % of clients correctly applied fertilizer, and what % of clients were planting in groups).

3. Early identification of cells that might have trouble with reimbursement. We hypothesize that reimbursement difficulties may be correlated with low cell/FO performance scores, either because planting wasn’t done well, and germination/plant performance may be low and/or because the FO and/or groups aren’t strong.

4. The true cost of inputs, including the cost of labor and the opportunity cost of time, and how these might differ between One Acre and control farmers. This will help us get a more granular and accurate measurement of the program’s impact.

At the end of the season, we’ll randomly select a subset of these clients with whom to conduct harvest surveys; this will help us correlate variables.

Analysis of this planting survey is still ongoing. Thus far, we’ve discovered that planting training was very well done (95% of clients trained on average, with many cells reaching 100% of clients). However, group planting is surprisingly low in some areas. We’ll be investigating this further, and hope the results will feed into strategies to improve group cohesion and reduce amount of planting labor per farmer.

Farmers also seem to be rationally reinterpreting grains and spacing instructions, and we’ll be working to better understand why and decide whether we need to alter our instructions accordingly. We’ll also continue diving into the details of the survey to see why and where certain indicators (such as group planting) vary from cell to cell.

We’ve also produced and presented the field officer performance results to the organization. They’ve now been incorporated as a quality of service metric in field officer performance reviews. We will use those scores in conjunction with reimbursement data to see what connections, if any, there are over the course of the season. We look forward to learning more about the links between our customer service and our impact.

December 1, 2011

Boniface, Rwandan Farmer

Filed under: FarmerProfile — Tags: — admin @ 9:38 AM

1November2011In November, the hills of rural Rwanda are covered in what seems like an endless variety of shades of green. There is the deep green of cassava leaves, the dark green of maize stalks, the medium green of climbing bean plants, and the light green of grasses and trees, each contributing to the patchwork appearance of the slopes.

On each of these slopes, farmers are hard at work, weeding their crops, applying fertilizer, and staking poles for their beans to climb. In Congo-Nil village, Rutsiro District, a farmer named Boniface was recently doing some work in his field of climbing beans.

Boniface is sixty-seven years old, and he has four children. Two are in secondary school, one is in primary school, and one is a baby that is too young for school. While Boniface staked poles in his field of climbing beans, his son watched the baby.

Boniface joined One Acre Fund this season, and he is treating his enrollment as an experiment. He has planted 1 kilogram of beans on a small plot of land, and he aims to harvest 8-10 kilograms from that plot. In the past, he has produced just 3 kilograms of beans from each kilogram he has planted.

If he achieves the harvest he hopes for, he will take his production and use it for seed to plant the next season. He will use fertilizer from One Acre Fund with that seed.

2November2011Even though Boniface has not received good yields from his own planting method in the past, he will only plant a large area of his land using the One Acre Fund method once he sees positive results in his small plot. His field officer knows that Boniface must be convinced of the benefits of One Acre Fund, and he is careful to give Boniface clear and simple instructions about how to care for his beans.

Boniface’s farmer group is called Twitezimbere, which means a wish to be developed. His field officer is confident that once Boniface harvests in January, he will begin to see his wish coming true.

November 25, 2011

Our Growing Monitoring and Evaluation Team in Rwanda, Part 1

Filed under: Operations — Tags: — admin @ 9:52 AM

At One Acre Fund, we focus on three results metrics: scale, impact, and sustainability. In each country operation, we have a monitoring and evaluation department that is responsible for measuring impact.

In Rwanda, the M&E department has expanded enormously in the past year (both in size and the professionalism of our personnel) in order to keep up with the growth of the organization as a whole. In November 2010, we had eleven staff working in two districts: nine full-time surveyors and two managers. Now, we have 41 staff serving six districts! We’ve increased to twenty-eight surveyors and four managers. In addition, we’ve added a senior leadership position—a director role—and a team of eight dedicated date-entry personnel.

The addition of the data entry team is particularly important. Because the volume of data that we are collecting has increased enormously, we were facing significant lag times between data collection and data analysis. One of our goals for the department is to expand our role beyond measuring impact, to providing real-time information that can be incorporated into strategy and operations. Training a dedicated data-entry team for the M&E department means that we can deploy a survey in the field for two weeks, enter the data, and within 1 month, have actionable information for the field operations department to use. Recently, we’ve conducted surveys to measure farmer interest in solar lights, trees, and a coffee loan product. These surveys have helped our operations team make informed decisions about product launches, and improved One Acre Fund’s service to our clients.

We’ve also instituted a series of tools and processes to help the M&E team channel and develop their curiosity, critical thinking, attention to detail, and time management. Each season (twice a year), the entire M&E department comes to headquarters for a meeting to discuss results, new survey ideas, and any challenges the tem is facing. In addition, we’ve implemented weekly agricultural and operations observations sheets that provide qualitative data to field directors. These sheets supplement the weekly key performance indicators that field officers report to field directors at their weekly staff meetings, and provide an additional layer of information for making management decisions. They also help the innovation team understand the prevalence of particular agriculture problems, such as disease or pests, and where we might be able to intervene with new products and trainings.

Depending on the survey, the M&E team speaks with between 400 and 2,500 smallholder farmers each week. The new tools that we’ve added to the department allow us to use that deep connection with farmers to improve our impact measurement, but also to help improve the customer service that our field team delivers. At One Acre Fund, every department puts farmers first!

November 14, 2011

One Acre Fund in the News

Filed under: News — Tags: , — admin @ 12:46 PM

We’ve been in the news lately:

- A feature article in the Solutions Journal tells the story of farmer Christine Walela and our operational model.

- A post on the ONE blog tells the story of one of our farmers in Rwanda.

- The USAID Microlinks website published a “Note from the Field” about how our complete service model helps smallholder farmers double their incomes per planted acre in one year.

November 2, 2011

A Prudent Investment for Kenya

Filed under: News, Policy — Tags: — admin @ 2:59 PM

This op-ed was originally published in The Nation, a Kenyan daily newspaper, on October 31:

Government ministries recently started the long and complicated process of planning for the 2012 Budget. By June next year, Kenyans will know what the government plans to spend on vital development programmes, and how much financial clout will be given to county governments.

Importantly, the general public will have a chance to discuss spending priorities. Public forums are scheduled across the country between now and the end of November.

This is a vital step in bringing greater accountability of resources down to the local level. This consultative process offers people in previously marginalised regions and sectors the chance to speak up.

In particular, attention should be turned to sectors that have the potential to bring Kenya closer to its economic growth targets in Vision 2030.

The sector that offers the greatest opportunity is agriculture. Kenya’s economy is predominantly dependent on agriculture. The sector directly contributes 26 per cent of the GDP and employs over 40 per cent of the population.

More importantly, over 43 per cent of Kenya’s population is food insecure and about 46 per cent — many of whom are in the rural areas — live below the absolute poverty line.

To increase economic growth, bring Kenya out of food insecurity, and decrease poverty levels, investment in agriculture is necessary.

Farmers need better roads in rural areas, better markets, access to quality seed and fertiliser, and access to up-to-date agriculture information pertinent to their geographic area.

Kenya’s agriculture sector recognises these needs and has drawn up a smart medium-term investment plan.

To execute this plan, however, needs funding. In 2010, the government signed the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme pact, an initiative of the African Union, which aims at increasing public investment in agriculture to at least 10 per cent of the annual budgets.

In 2011, the government increased its budgetary allotment for agriculture to nine per cent. These resources were divided between 10 ministries that included Agriculture, Water and Irrigation, Lands, and Environment and Mineral Resources, among others.

But nine per cent of the national budget is not enough to transform the agriculture sector. Vision 2030 sets lofty targets for Kenya’s economy, and chief among them are economic growth of 10 per cent by 2012.

This target will not be met without a considerable increase in the budget that specifically targets agribusiness and food security for the rural poor.

The agriculture organisation I work for, One Acre Fund, serves 28,000 smallholder farmers in western Kenya. We offer a complete service model — seed and fertiliser, financing, training, and market facilitation — that enables farmers to double their income per acre in one year.

We are a microcosm of what Kenya’s agriculture sector could achieve with increased public investment.

With such potential in agriculture, the only risk is that the government misses a golden opportunity by not providing more resources to this nationally vital sector.

For example, studies show that one shilling spent on research and extension will cause the GDP to increase by Sh6.3 in the period 2006-15.

The public forums, which will be held in November, will offer everyone the opportunity to address how the government spends its money, not just at the national level, but at the county level.

Regional development plans are already in the offing, and strategies that will support agribusiness and promote food security should be given a significant boost by the Treasury.

Counties are expected to begin delivering in these areas after the next election. We must make sure that financial support for agriculture continues in the handover from national to local government.

Devolution will need to be properly supported and sectors such as agriculture may even require more than the constitutional minimum 15 per cent of national revenue, particularly in counties where agriculture offers great hope.

It is one thing to devolve authority to counties, but another thing to provide the necessary resources for them to succeed.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress